Title: 

PHI Air Medical, LLC v. Texas Mutual Insurance Company

Date: 

December 17, 2020

Citation: 

03-17-00081-CV

Court: 

Status: 

Unpublished Opinion

No History

Table of Contents

Court of Appeals of Texas, Austin.

PHI AIR MEDICAL, LLC, Appellant

v.

TEXAS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY; Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company; TASB Risk Management Fund; Transportation Insurance Company; Truck Insurance Exchange; Twin City Fire Insurance Company; Valley Forge Insurance Company; Zenith Insurance Company; and Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation, Appellees

NO. 03-17-00081-CV

|

Filed: December 17, 2020

Attorneys & Firms

Matthew Baumgartner, P. M. Schenkkan, Graves, Dougherty, Hearon & Moody, 401 Congress Avenue, Suite 2200, Austin, TX 78701, Lisa A. Bennett, Office of the Attorney General of Texas, P. O. Box 12548 (MC 059), Austin, TX 78711-2548, Bryan W. Jones, Texas Mutual Insurance Company, 2200 Aldrich Street, Austin, TX 78723, James M. Loughlin, Stone, Loughlin & Swanson, LLP, P. O. Box 30111, Austin, TX 78755, Mary Barrow Nichols, Texas Mutual Insurance Company, 6210 East Highway 290, Austin, TX 78723, for Appellees.

Amy L. Saberian, Enoch Kever PLLC, 5918 W. Courtyard Dr., Suite 500, Austin, TX 78730, Craig T. Enoch, Shelby Leigh O’Brien, Enoch Kever PLLC, 7600 N. Capital of Texas Hwy., Building B, Suite 200, Austin, TX 78731, for Appellant.

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Kelly

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

*1 Appellant PHI Air Medical, LLC, appealed the trial court’s judgment in favor of Texas Mutual Insurance Company, Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company, TASB Risk Management Fund, Transportation Insurance Company, Truck Insurance Exchange, Twin City Fire Insurance Company, Valley Forge Insurance Company, and Zenith Insurance Company (collectively “the Insurers”). This Court reversed the trial court’s judgment. See PHI Air Med., LLC v. Texas Mut. Ins., 549 S.W.3d 804 (Tex. App.—Austin 2018). The Insurers and the Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation appealed, and the Texas Supreme Court reversed this Court’s decision and remanded to this Court. Texas Mut. Ins. v. PHI Air Med., LLC, ––– S.W.3d ––––, 2020 WL 3477002 (Tex. June 26, 2020). PHI then filed a petition for writ of certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS).

PHI has now filed an unopposed motion to stay proceedings until after SCOTUS has reviewed the petition. We grant the motion and abate the appeal pending review by SCOTUS. The parties are instructed to notify this Court within thirty days of SCOTUS’s decision regarding whether to grant the petition. Failure to timely comply may result in the case being dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).