Title: 

Phillips v. Texas Department of Insurance Division of Workers’ Compensation

Date: 

July 8, 2022

Citation: 

05-22-00610-CV

Court: 

Status: 

Unpublished Opinion

No History

Table of Contents

Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.

Deloris PHILLIPS, Appellant

v.

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE DIVISION OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION, Fleming Foods, Inc., Core-Mark Holding Co., the Raymond Corp., Cigna Insurance Co., Bankers Standard Insurance Co., ESIS-Chubb Management Corp., Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., United Parcel Service, Inc., Teamsters Local Union 767, City of Dallas Municipality, Dallas County Municipality, and Dallas Police Department, Appellees

No. 05-22-00610-CV

|

Opinion Filed July 8, 2022

Attorneys & Firms

Deloris Phillips, Pro Se.

David L. Brenner, Burns Anderson Jury & Brenner, LLC, Austin, Robert Reginald Graves Jr., Law Office of Robert Graves, Austin, for Appellee Bankers Standard Insurance.

Devin Q. Alexander, Tatia R. Wilson, Dallas City Attorney’s Office, Dallas, for Appellee City of Dallas Municipality.

Todd Keith Sellars, Assistant Criminal District Attorney, Dallas, for Appellee Dallas County Municipality.

Christopher M. Losey, Downs & Stanford PC, Dallas, for Appellee Liberty Mutual Insurance.

Chalon N. Clark, Husch Blackwell LLP, Dallas, Francis H. LoCoco, Husch Blackwell LLP, Milwaukee WI, for Appellee Raymond Forklift Trucks.

Jamie King Harrison, James Roddy Tanner, Tanner and Associates, P.C., Fort Worth, for Appellee Teamsters Local Union 767.

James Anthony Person III, Texas Department of Insurance, Austin, Dennis M. McKinney, Office of the Attorney General of Texas, Austin, for Appellee Texas Department of Insurance Division of Workers Compensation, et al.

John V. Jansonius, Jackson Walker L.L.P., Dallas, for Appellee United Parcel Service, Inc.

Before Chief Justice Burns, Justice Goldstein, and Justice Smith

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Opinion by Chief Justice Burns

*1 Before the Court is appellant’s petition for permissive appeal. The petition fails to meet each requirement set forth in Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 28.3(a), (e). Accordingly, we deny the petition and dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See id.; 42.3(a); Draper v. Guernsey, No. 03-15-00741-CV, 2016 WL 462763, at *2 (Tex. App.—Austin Feb. 3, 2016, pet. denied) (mem. op.) (dismissing appeal for want of jurisdiction because appellant failed to obtain trial court order granting permission to pursue permissive appeal of interlocutory order).