Title: 

APD 011539

Significant Decision

Date: 

August 14, 2001

Issues: 

Disabilty/Existence-Duration, Existence of Compensable Inj

Table of Contents

APD 011539

This appeal arises pursuant to the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act, TEX. LAB. CODE ANN. § 401.001 et seq. (1989 Act). A contested case hearing was held on June 12, 2001. The hearing officer determined that the appellant (claimant) sustained a compensable lower back strain injury on ____________, but did not have disability for any period of time as a result of the compensable injury. On appeal, the claimant expresses disagreement with the hearing officer’s disability determination. The respondent (carrier) urges affirmance.

DECISION

Affirmed.

Disability is defined as the inability to obtain and retain employment at wages equivalent to the preinjury wage due to a compensable injury. Section 401.011(16). It is well-settled that a claimant has the burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that she sustained disability as a result of a compensable injury. Texas Workers’ Compensation Commission Appeal No. 93953, decided December 7, 1993; Texas Workers’ Compensation Commission Appeal No. 93143, decided April 9, 1993.Disability is a question of fact for the hearing officer. Texas Workers’ Compensation Commission Appeal No. 93560, decided August 19, 1993. The hearing officer is the sole judge of the weight and credibility of the evidence. Section 410.165(a). As the trier of fact, the hearing officer resolves conflicts and inconsistencies in the evidence and decides what facts the evidence has established. The hearing officer’s determination that the claimant did not have disability as a result of the compensable injury is supported by medical evidence in the record, including the opinion of a referral doctor who obtained various diagnostic tests. Nothing in our review of the record demonstrates that the hearing officer’s disability determination is so against the great weight of the evidence as to be clearly wrong or manifestly unjust. Accordingly, no sound basis exists for us to reverse that determination on appeal. Pool v. Ford Motor Co., 715 S.W.2d 629, 635 (Tex. 1986); Cain v. Bain, 709 S.W.2d 175, 176 (Tex. 1986).

We affirm the hearing officer’s decision and order.

Philip F. O’Neill – Appeals Judge

CONCUR:

Susan M. Kelley – Appeals Judge

Michael B. McShane – Appeals Judge