This appeal arises pursuant to the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act, TEX. LAB. CODE ANN. § 401.001 et seq. (1989 Act). A contested case hearing was held on May 23, 2002. The hearing officer determined that the claimant’s current bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) was included as an extent of her __________, compensable injury. The carrier has appealed this determination without response from the claimant.
DECISION
We affirm the hearing officer’s decision.
The hearing officer had the opportunity to consider the gap in the claimant’s medical care along with current medical opinion describing her CTS as a recurrence of her prior repetitive trauma injury. As we have before stated, the fact that different inferences could be drawn from the evidence will not alone compel a reversal unless the inferences are against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence so as to be manifestly unfair or unjust. See National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania v. Soto, 819 S.W.2d 619, 620 (Tex. App.-El Paso 1991, writ denied); American Motorists Insurance Co. v. Volentine, 867 S.W.2d 170 (Tex. App.-Beaumont 1993, no writ). We do not agree that this was the case here and affirm the decision and order.
The true corporate name of the insurance carrier is CAMDEN FIRE INSURANCE ASSOCIATION and the name and address of its registered agent for service of process is
C. J. FIELDS
5910 NORTH CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY, SUITE 500
DALLAS, TEXAS 75206.
Susan M. Kelley – Appeals Judge
CONCUR:
Thomas A. Knapp – Appeals Judge
Michael B. McShane – Appeals Judge