This appeal arises pursuant to the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act, TEX. LAB. CODE ANN. ‘ 401.001 et seq. (1989 Act). A contested case hearing was held on June 6, 2002. The hearing officer determined that appellant (claimant) sustained a repetitive trauma injury at work; claimant did not timely report the injury; the date of injury is ________ and that claimant did not have disability. Claimant appealed these determinations on sufficiency grounds. Respondent (carrier) responded that the Appeals Panel should affirm the hearing officer’s decision and order.
DECISION
We affirm.
We have reviewed the complained-of determinations and conclude that the issues involved fact questions for the hearing officer. The hearing officer reviewed the record and decided what facts were established. The hearing officer must judge credibility, assign weight, and resolve conflicts and inconsistencies in the evidence. In doing so she may believe all, part, or none of any testimony before her. Ashcraft v. United Supermarkets, Inc., 758 S.W.2d 375 (Tex. App.-Amarillo 1988, writ denied). We conclude that the hearing officer’s determinations are not so against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence as to be clearly wrong or manifestly unjust. Cain v. Bain, 709 S.W.2d 175, 176 (Tex. 1986). Regarding disability, it appears that the hearing officer determined that, if not for the layoff on October 25, 2001, claimant would have been able to keep earning his preinjury wage. We perceive no error.
We affirm the hearing officer’s decision and order.
According to information provided by carrier, the true corporate name of the insurance carrier is PACIFIC EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY and the name and address of its registered agent for service of process is
ROBIN MOUNTAIN ACE USA
6600 EAST CAMPUS CIRCLE DRIVE, SUITE 200
IRVING, TEXAS 75063.
Judy L. S. Barnes – Appeals Judge
CONCUR:
Veronica Lopez – Appeals Judge
Robert W. Potts – Appeals Judge