Title: 

APD 041158

Significant Decision

Date: 

July 8, 2004

Issues: 

Extent of Injury

Table of Contents

APD 041158

This appeal arises pursuant to the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act, TEX. LAB. CODE ANN. § 401.001 et seq. (1989 Act). A contested case hearing was held on April 27, 2004. With respect to the issue before her, the hearing officer determined that the respondent’s (claimant) compensable injury of ________________, does extend to and include tri-compartmental osteoarthrosis of the right knee. In its appeal, the appellant (carrier) argues that the hearing officer’s extent-of-injury determination is against the overwhelming weight of the evidence and should be overturned. The appeal file does not contain a response to the carrier’s appeal from the claimant.

DECISION

Affirmed.

The hearing officer did not err in determining that the claimant’s compensable injury of ________________, extends to and includes tri-compartmental osteoarthrosis of the right knee. That issue presented a question of fact for the hearing officer to resolve. The hearing officer is the sole judge of the weight and credibility of the evidence. Section 410.165(a). As the trier of fact, the hearing officer resolves the conflicts and inconsistencies in the evidence and decides what facts the evidence has established. Texas Employers Ins. Ass’n v. Campos, 666 S.W.2d 286 (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1984, no writ). There was conflicting evidence on the disputed issue and the hearing officer was acting within her province as the fact finder in deciding that the evidence was sufficient and that it causally related the MRI findings of the right knee to the claimant’s injury sustained on ________________. Nothing in our review of the record reveals that the challenged determination is so against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence as to be clearly wrong or manifestly unjust. Accordingly, no sound basis exists for us to reverse that determination on appeal. Cain v. Bain, 709 S.W.2d 175 (Tex. 1986).

We affirm the decision and order of the hearing officer.

The true corporate name of the insurance carrier is FIRST LIBERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION and the name and address of its registered agent for service of process is

CT CORPORATION SYSTEMS

350 NORTH ST. PAUL STREET, SUITE 2900

DALLAS, TEXAS 75201.

Michael B. McShane

Appeals Panel

Manager/Judge

CONCUR:

Chris Cowan – Appeals Judge

Gary L. Kilgore – Appeals Judge