Title: 

APD 030101

Significant Decision

Date: 

March 3, 2003

Issues: 

Disabilty/Existence-Duration, Existence of Compensable Inj, Timely Contest by Carrier

Table of Contents

APD 030101

This appeal arises pursuant to the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act, TEX. LAB. CODE ANN. § 401.001 et seq. (1989 Act). A contested case hearing was held on December 9, 2002. The hearing officer determined that the appellant (claimant) did not sustain a compensable injury on _____________, and that the claimant did not have disability resulting from a compensable injury. The claimant appeals and the respondent (carrier) responds, urging affirmance. The hearing officer’s determination that the carrier did not waive the right to contest compensability of the injury has not been appealed.

DECISION

Affirmed.

Essentially, the claimant quarrels with the manner in which the hearing officer gave weight and credibility to the evidence. The hearing officer is the sole judge of the relevance, materiality, weight, and credibility of the evidence presented at the hearing. Section 410.165(a). The decision should not be set aside because different inferences and conclusions may be drawn upon review, even when the record contains evidence that would lend itself to different inferences. Garza v. Commercial Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey, 508 S.W.2d 701 (Tex. Civ. App.-Amarillo 1974, no writ). An appeals-level body is not a fact finder and does not normally pass upon the credibility of witnesses or substitute its own judgment for that of the trier of fact, even if the evidence would support a different result. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania v. Soto, 819 S.W.2d 619, 620 (Tex. App.-El Paso 1991, writ denied); American Motorists Insurance Co. v. Volentine, 867 S.W.2d 170 (Tex. App.-Beaumont 1993, no writ).

The record in this case presented conflicting evidence for the hearing officer to resolve. In considering all the evidence in the record, we cannot agree that the findings of the hearing officer are so against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence as to be manifestly wrong and unjust. In re King’s Estate, 150 Tex. 662, 244 S.W.2d 660 (1951).

In addition, without a determination that there was a compensable injury, the threshold requirement for finding disability did not exist. See Section 401.011(16).

We therefore affirm the decision and order.

The true corporate name of the insurance carrier is TEXAS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and the and address of its registered agent for service of process is

MR. RUSSELL R. OLIVER, PRESIDENT

221 WEST 6TH STREET

AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701.

Roy L. Warren – Appeals Judge

CONCUR:

Judy L. S. Barnes – Appeals Judge

Robert W. Potts – Appeals Judge