Title: 

APD 030617

Significant Decision

Date: 

April 29, 2003

Issues: 

Extent of Injury

Table of Contents

APD 030617

This appeal arises pursuant to the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act, TEX. LAB. CODE ANN. § 401.001 et seq. (1989 Act). A contested case hearing (CCH) was held on February 12, 2003. The hearing officer resolved the disputed issues by deciding that the respondent’s (claimant) compensable injury of ____________, extends to include the claimant’s current right shoulder condition, but does not extend to include the rotator cuff tears; and that the claimant has disability from May 14, 2002, through the date of the CCH. The appellant (carrier) appeals, arguing that the hearing officer’s extent-of-injury and disability determinations that are unfavorable to the carrier are against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence. The appeal file does not contain a response from the claimant.

DECISION

Affirmed.

Extent of injury and disability are factual questions for the fact finder to resolve. The hearing officer, as finder of fact, is the sole judge of the relevance and materiality of the evidence as well as the weight and credibility that is to be given to the evidence. Section 410.165(a). It is for the hearing officer to resolve the inconsistencies and conflicts in the evidence and to decide what facts the evidence has established. Garza v. Commercial Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey, 508 S.W.2d 701 (Tex. Civ. App.-Amarillo 1974, no writ). There is sufficient evidence to support the hearing officer’s extent-of-injury and disability determinations. Nothing in our review of the record reveals that the challenged determinations are so against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence as to be clearly wrong or manifestly unjust. Accordingly, no sound basis exists for us to disturb the extent-of-injury and disability determinations on appeal. Cain v. Bain, 709 S.W.2d 175 (Tex. 1986).

The hearing officer’s decision and order are affirmed.

The true corporate name of the insurance carrier is (a self-insured governmental entity) and the name and address of its registered agent for service of process is

CEO

(ADDRESS)

(CITY), TEXAS (ZIP CODE).

Gary L. Kilgore – Appeals Judge

CONCUR:

Thomas A. Knapp – Appeals Judge

Roy L. Warren – Appeals Judge