Title: 

APD 030969

Significant Decision

Date: 

May 19, 2003

Issues: 

Allegation of Bona Fide Offer, Extent of Injury, Timely Contest by Carrier, Timely Reporting to Employer

Table of Contents

APD 030969

This appeal arises pursuant to the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act, TEX. LAB. CODE ANN. § 401.001 et seq. (1989 Act). A consolidated contested case hearing was held on March 28, 2003. The hearing officer resolved the disputed issues by deciding that the appellant’s (claimant) compensable injury to his low back on (first date of injury), does not extend to nor include an injury to his right shoulder or his left elbow, and that the claimant did not sustain a compensable injury on (second date of injury). The claimant appealed on sufficiency of the evidence grounds. The respondent (carrier) responded, urging affirmance.

DECISION

Affirmed.

The disputed issues of injury and extent of injury presented questions of fact for the hearing officer. The hearing officer is the sole judge of the weight and credibility of the evidence. Section 410.165(a); Texas Employers Ins. Ass’n v. Campos, 666 S.W.2d 286 (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1984, no writ). It was for the hearing officer, as the trier of fact, to resolve the conflicts and inconsistencies in the evidence and to determine what facts had been established. Garza v. Commercial Ins. Co., 508 S.W.2d 701 (Tex. Civ. App.-Amarillo 1974, no writ). Nothing in our review of the record reveals that the hearing officer’s determinations are so contrary to the great weight and preponderance of the evidence as to be clearly wrong or manifestly unjust. As such, no sound basis exists for us to reverse those determinations on appeal. Cain v. Bain, 709 S.W.2d 175, 176 (Tex. 1986).

With regard to the claimant’s assertion that “[b]ecause of language barriers, it was unclear to [the claimant] what the process would be for this new injury” and that the employer should have filed a new report for his alleged new injury of June 8, 2002, we note that this argument was raised for the first time on appeal and it should have been raised with the hearing officer.

The hearing officer’s decision and order are affirmed.

The true corporate name of the insurance carrier is AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY and the name and address of its registered agent for service of process is

CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY

800 BRAZOS, SUITE 750, COMMODORE 1

AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701.

Veronica L. Ruberto

CONCUR:

Margaret L. Turner – Appeals Judge

Edward Vilano – Appeals Judge