This appeal arises pursuant to the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act, TEX. LAB. CODE ANN. § 401.001 et seq. (1989 Act). A contested case hearing was held on May 20, 2003. The hearing officer determined that appellant (claimant) did not sustain a compensable injury on ___________, and that she did not have disability. An issue regarding timely notice was withdrawn by agreement. Claimant appealed these determinations on sufficiency grounds. The file does not contain a response from respondent (carrier).
DECISION
We affirm.
We have reviewed the complained-of determinations regarding injury and disability and conclude that the issues involved fact questions for the hearing officer. Claimant testified that she sustained a back injury at work on ___________. The hearing officer reviewed the record and decided what facts were established. We conclude that the hearing officer’s determinations are supported by the record and are not so against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence as to be clearly wrong or manifestly unjust. Cain v. Bain, 709 S.W.2d 175, 176 (Tex. 1986).
We affirm the hearing officer’s decision and order.
According to information provided by carrier, the true corporate name of the insurance carrier is TRINITY UNIVERSAL INSURANCE COMPANY and the name and address of its registered agent for service of process is
DOROTHY LANGLEY
10000 NORTH CENTRAL EXPRESSWAY
DALLAS, TEXAS 75265.
Judy L. S. Barnes – Appeals Judge
CONCUR:
Chris Cowan – Appeals Judge
Robert W. Potts – Appeals Judge