This appeal arises pursuant to the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act, TEX. LAB. CODE ANN. § 401.001 et seq. (1989 Act). A contested case hearing was held on March 30, 2001. With regard to the issues before him, the hearing officer determined that the __________, compensable right wrist injury of the respondent (claimant) extended to and included her left wrist but not her neck. Appellant (carrier) appeals, contending that the hearing officer’s determination regarding the left wrist is against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence. The hearing officer’s determination that claimant’s compensable injury does not extent to her neck has not been appealed and has become final. Claimant responds urging affirmance.
DECISION
We affirm.
Carrier appeals the hearing officer’s determinations on sufficiency grounds. The matters carrier complained of in its brief all concern credibility and fact issues, which were for the hearing officer to consider. See Texas Workers’ Compensation Commission Appeal No. 952212, decided February 8, 1996. We have reviewed the complained-of determinations and we conclude that they are not so against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence as to be clearly wrong or manifestly unjust. Cain v. Bain, 709 S.W.2d 175, 176 (Tex. 1986).
We affirm the hearing officer’s decision and order.
Judy L. S. Barnes – Appeals Judge
CONCUR:
Thomas A. Knapp – Appeals Judge
Robert W. Potts – Appeals Judge