This appeal arises pursuant to the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act, TEX. LAB. CODE ANN. § 401.001 et seq. (1989 Act). A contested case hearing was held on June 12, 2001. He determined that the appellant (claimant) is not entitled to supplemental income benefits for the first compensable quarter and that the compensable injury, which the claimant sustained on ____________, does not extend to and include her cervical spine and left shoulder. On appeal, claimant contends the hearing officer’s determinations are not supported by sufficient evidence. Respondent (carrier) urges affirmance.
DECISION
We affirm.
We have reviewed the complained-of determinations and conclude that the issues involved fact questions for the hearing officer. The hearing officer reviewed the record and decided what facts were established. We conclude that the hearing officer’s determinations are not so against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence as to be clearly wrong or manifestly unjust. Cain v. Bain, 709 S.W.2d 175, 176 (Tex. 1986). We also perceive no error in the wording of Finding of Fact No. 15, nor do we perceive that the hearing officer misstated the evidence.
We affirm the hearing officer’s decision and order.
Judy L. S. Barnes
CONCUR:
Thomas A. Knapp – Appeals Judge
Robert W. Potts – Appeals Judge