This appeal arises pursuant to the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act, TEX. LAB. CODE ANN. § 401.001 et seq. (1989 Act). A contested case hearing was held on May 15, 2001, and July 24, 2001. The hearing officer determined that the appellant (claimant) did not sustain a compensable injury on ______________; that she did not have disability; and that the respondent (carrier) is relieved from liability under Section 409.002 because of claimant’s failure to timely notify her employer of the claimed injury. On appeal, claimant contends that these determinations are against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence. Carrier urges affirmance.
DECISION
We affirm.
We have reviewed the complained-of determinations and conclude that the issues involved fact questions for the hearing officer. The hearing officer reviewed the record and decided what facts were established. We conclude that the hearing officer’s determinations are not so against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence as to be clearly wrong or manifestly unjust. Cain v. Bain, 709 S.W.2d 175, 176 (Tex. 1986).
We affirm the hearing officer’s decision and order.
The true corporate name of the insurance carrier is CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY and the name and address of its registered agent for service of process is
CT Corporation
350 N. Pearl
Dallas, Texas 75201.
Judy L. S. Barnes
CONCUR:
Elaine M. Chaney – Appeals Judge
Michael B. McShane – Appeals Judge