Title: 

APD 020306

Significant Decision

Date: 

March 19, 2002

Issues: 

Disabilty/Existence-Duration, Extent of Injury

Table of Contents

APD 020306

This appeal arises pursuant to the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act, TEX. LAB. CODE ANN. § 401.001 et seq. (1989 Act). A contested case hearing was held on January 16, 2002. The hearing officer determined that (1) the compensable injury sustained on ____________, extended to include a cervical strain/sprain but did not include multilevel degenerative dessication of the intervertebral discs with straightening of the normal cervical lordosis and minimal narrowing of the intervertebral discs and small central disc herniations/protrusions at C3-4, C4-5, C5-6 without deformity of the spinal cord and with minimal to mild central spinal canal stenosis; and (2) the appellant/cross-respondent (claimant) had disability from June 13, 2001, to July 18, 2001, resulting from the injury sustained on ____________. The claimant appealed the extent of injury determination with regard to the excluded conditions, on sufficiency grounds. The respondent/cross-appellant (carrier) urges affirmance of the appealed determination. The carrier cross-appealed the extent-of-injury determination with regard to the included conditions and the disability determination, on sufficiency grounds. The claimant urges affirmance of the cross-appealed determination.

DECISION

Affirmed.

The hearing officer did not err in reaching the complained-of determination. The determination involved questions of fact for the hearing officer to resolve. The hearing officer is the sole judge of the weight and credibility of the evidence (Section 410.165(a)) and, as the trier of fact, resolves the conflicts and inconsistencies in the evidence, including the medical evidence (Texas Employers Insurance Association v. Campos, 666 S.W.2d 286 (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1984, no writ)). In view of the evidence presented, we cannot conclude that the hearing officer’s determinations are so against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence as to be clearly wrong or manifestly unjust. Cain v. Bain, 709 S.W.2d 175 (Tex. 1986).

The decision and order of the hearing officer are affirmed.

The true corporate name of the carrier is AMERICAN ZURICH INSURANCE COMPANY and the name and address of its registered agent for service of process is

GEORGE MICHAEL JONES

9330 LBJ FREEWAY, SUITE 1200

DALLAS, TEXAS 75243.

Edward Vilano – Appeals Judge

CONCUR:

Michael B. McShane – Appeals Judge

Thomas A. Knapp – Appeals Judge