Title: 

APD 020763

Significant Decision

Date: 

May 8, 2002

Issues: 

Extent of Injury

Table of Contents

APD 020763

This appeal arises pursuant to the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act, TEX. LAB. CODE ANN. § 401.001 et seq. (1989 Act). A contested case hearing was held on February 12, 2002. The hearing officer resolved the sole disputed issue by determining that the “compensable injury does not include or extend to include an injury for tracheal stenosis, nor for bronchial asthma.” In her appeal, the appellant (claimant) essentially argues that the hearing officer’s determination in that regard is against the great weight of the evidence. In its response, the respondent (carrier) urges affirmance.

DECISION

Affirmed.

The hearing officer did not err in determining that the claimant’s compensable injury does not extend to or include tracheal stenosis and bronchial asthma. Extent of injury is a question of fact for the hearing officer to resolve. Texas Workers’ Compensation Commission Appeal No. 93613, decided August 24, 1993. Section 410.165(a) provides that the hearing officer, as finder of fact, is the sole judge of the relevance and materiality of the evidence as well as of the weight and credibility to be given the evidence. It was for the hearing officer, as trier of fact, to resolve the inconsistencies and conflicts in the evidence and to decide what facts that evidence established. Garza v. Commercial Ins. Co., 508 S.W.2d 701, 702 (Tex. Civ. App.-Amarillo 1974, no writ). The hearing officer was not persuaded that the claimant sustained her burden of proving that her compensable injury included tracheal stenosis and bronchial asthma. The hearing officer was acting within her province as the fact finder in so finding. Nothing in our review of the record demonstrates that the challenged determination is so against the great weight of the evidence as to be clearly wrong or manifestly unjust. Accordingly, no sound basis exists for us to disturb the hearing officer’s extent-of-injury determination on appeal. Cain v. Bain, 709 S.W.2d 175, 176 (Tex. 1986).

The hearing officer’s decision and order are affirmed.

The true corporate name of the insurance carrier is ACE INSURANCE COMPANY and the name and address of its registered agent for service of process is

MARCUS CHARLES MERRITT

6600 CAMPUS CIRCLE DRIVE EAST

IRVING, TEXAS 75063.

Elaine M. Chaney

CONCUR:

Daniel R. Barry – Appeals Judge

Michael B. McShane – Appeals Judge