Title: 

APD 021992

Significant Decision

Date: 

September 18, 2002

Issues: 

Disabilty/Existence-Duration, Existence of Compensable Inj, Timely Reporting to Employer

Table of Contents

APD 021992

This appeal arises pursuant to the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act, TEX. LAB. CODE ANN. § 401.001 et seq. (1989 Act). A contested case hearing was held on July 9, 2002. The hearing officer resolved the disputed issues by determining that the appellant (claimant) did not sustain a compensable injury on ________ that he did not give timely notice to his employer of the claimed injury; and that he did not have disability. On appeal, the claimant expresses disagreement with these determinations. The appeal file contains no response from the respondent (self-insured).

DECISION

We affirm the hearing officer’s decision.

Whether the claimant sustained a compensable injury, had disability, and gave timely notice to his employer of the claimed injury were factual questions for the hearing officer to resolve. Section 410.165(a) provides that the contested case hearing officer, as finder of fact, is the sole judge of the relevance and materiality of the evidence as well as of the weight and credibility that is to be given the evidence. It was for the hearing officer, as trier of fact, to resolve the inconsistencies and conflicts in the evidence. Garza v. Commercial Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey, 508 S.W.2d 701, 702 (Tex. Civ. App.-Amarillo 1974, no writ). The trier of fact may believe all, part, or none of the testimony of any witness. Taylor v. Lewis, 553 S.W.2d 153, 161 (Tex. Civ. App.-Amarillo 1977, writ ref’d n.r.e.); Aetna Insurance Co. v. English, 204 S.W.2d 850 (Tex. Civ. App.-Fort Worth 1947, no writ). The hearing officer explained that he did not find the claimant to be credible and found against him on the disputed issues. In view of the evidence presented, we cannot conclude that the hearing officer’s determinations are so against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence as to be clearly wrong or manifestly unjust. Cain v. Bain, 709 S.W.2d 175 (Tex. 1986).

The decision and order of the hearing officer are affirmed.

The true corporate name of the insurance carrier (self-insured) is (SELF- INSURED) and the name and address of its registered agent for service of process is

CITY SECRETARY (ADDRESS)

(CITY), TEXAS (ZIP CODE).

Philip F. O’Neill – Appeals Judge

CONCUR:

Judy L. S. Barnes – Appeals Judge

Veronica Lopez – Appeals Judge