Title: 

APD 031024

Significant Decision

Date: 

May 27, 2003

Issues: 

Compensability-Occupationl Inj, Date of Injury, Disabilty/Existence-Duration, Timely Reporting to Employer

Table of Contents

APD 031024

This appeal arises pursuant to the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act, TEX. LAB. CODE ANN. § 401.001 et seq. (1989 Act). A contested case hearing (CCH) was held on March 24, 2003. The hearing officer resolved the disputed issues by deciding that the appellant (claimant) did not sustain a compensable injury; that the date of the alleged injury is ____________; that because the claimant did not sustain a compensable injury, the claimant did not have disability; and that the claimant timely notified her employer pursuant to Section 409.001. The claimant appealed the compensable injury and disability determinations, arguing that the evidence presented at the CCH showed that her work was repetitive and confirmed that she suffers from bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome. The respondent (carrier) responded, urging affirmance.

DECISION

Affirmed.

The claimant had the burden to prove that she sustained a compensable injury and that she has had disability. The claimant claimed that she sustained a repetitive trauma injury as a result of performing her work activities for the employer. Section 401.011(34) provides that an occupational disease includes a repetitive trauma injury, which is defined in Section 401.011(36). Section 401.011(16) defines “disability” as “the inability because of a compensable injury to obtain and retain employment at wages equivalent to the preinjury wage.” By definition disability depends upon a compensable injury. Conflicting evidence was presented at the CCH. The hearing officer is the sole judge of the weight and credibility of the evidence. Section 410.165(a). As the finder of fact, the hearing officer resolves the conflicts in the evidence and determines what facts have been established from the evidence presented. We conclude that the hearing officer’s determinations on the disputed issues are supported by sufficient evidence and are not so against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence as to be clearly wrong and unjust. Cain v. Bain, 709 S.W. 2d 175 (Tex. 1986).

We affirm the decision and order of the hearing officer.

The true corporate name of the insurance carrier is THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF ILLINOIS and the name and address of its registered agent for service of process is

CT CORPORATION SYSTEM

350 NORTH ST. PAUL STREET

DALLAS, TEXAS 75201.

Margaret L. Turner

CONCUR:

Veronica L. Ruberto – Appeals Judge

Robert W. Potts – Appeals Judge