Title: 

APD 031155

Significant Decision

Date: 

June 25, 2003

Issues: 

Disabilty/Existence-Duration, Existence of Compensable Inj

Table of Contents

APD 031155

This appeal arises pursuant to the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act, TEX. LAB. CODE ANN. § 401.001 et seq. (1989 Act). A contested case hearing was held on April 8, 2003. The hearing officer resolved the disputed issue by deciding that the appellant (claimant) did not sustain a compensable injury on ____________, and did not have disability. The claimant appealed, arguing that the hearing officer erred as a matter of law. In its response, the respondent (carrier) asserts that sufficient evidence supports the determinations of the hearing officer and requests affirmance.

DECISION

Affirmed.

The claimant had the burden to prove that she sustained a compensable injury as defined by Section 401.011(10) and that she had disability as defined by Section 401.011(16). Conflicting evidence was presented on the disputed issues. The hearing officer is the sole judge of the weight and credibility of the evidence. Section 410.165(a). As the finder of fact, the hearing officer resolves the conflicts in the evidence and determines what facts have been established. The hearing officer noted that the claimant failed to prove by a preponderance of the credible evidence that she sustained an injury to her foot in the course and scope of employment on ____________. We do not agree with the claimant’s assertion that the hearing officer erred as a matter of law. Rather, the issues addressed in the claimant’s appeal were factual determinations for the hearing officer to decide. The hearing officer’s decision is supported by sufficient evidence and is not so against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence as to be clearly wrong and unjust. Cain v. Bain, 709 S.W.2d 175 (Tex. 1986).

The 1989 Act requires the existence of a compensable injury as a prerequisite to a finding of disability. Section 401.011(16). Because we have affirmed the determination that the claimant did not sustain a compensable injury, we likewise affirm the determination that she did not have disability.

We affirm the decision and order of the hearing officer.

The true corporate name of the insurance carrier is FIDELITY AND GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY and the name and address of its registered agent for service of process is

CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY

800 BRAZOS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701.

Margaret L. Turner

CONCUR:

Judy L. S. Barnes – Appeals Judge

Chris Cowan – Appeals Judge