Title: 

APD 032387

Significant Decision

Date: 

October 28, 2003

Issues: 

Extent of Injury

Table of Contents

APD 032387

This appeal arises pursuant to the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act, TEX. LAB. CODE ANN. § 401.001 et seq. (1989 Act). A contested case hearing was held on August 6, 2003. The hearing officer resolved the disputed issue by deciding that the compensable injury of ______________, does not include an injury to the left knee. The appellant (claimant) appealed, disputing the determination of the hearing officer. The respondent (carrier) responded, urging affirmance.

DECISION

Affirmed.

The parties stipulated that on ______________, the claimant sustained a compenable injury to the right knee. Extent of injury is a factual question for the hearing officer to resolve. Section 410.165(a) provides that the hearing officer, as finder of fact, is the sole judge of the relevance and materiality of the evidence as well as of the weight and credibility that is to be given to the evidence. It was the hearing officer’s prerogative to believe all, part, or none of the testimony of any witness, including that of the claimant. Aetna Insurance Company v. English, 204 S.W.2d 850 (Tex. Civ. App.-Fort Worth 1947, no writ). The hearing officer was not persuaded that the left knee injury was a result of an altered gait from the compensable injury or that the claimant’s fall on ______________, caused the claimant’s left knee injury. Nothing in our review of the record indicates that the challenged determination is so against the great weight of the evidence as to be clearly wrong or manifestly unjust. Cain v. Bain, 709 S.W.2d 175 (Tex. 1986).

We affirm the decision and order of the hearing officer.

The true corporate name of the insurance carrier is TRANSPORTATION INSURANCE COMPANY and the name and address of its registered agent for service of process is

CT CORPORATION

350 NORTH ST. PAUL

DALLAS, TEXAS 75201.

Margaret L. Turner

CONCUR:

Elaine M. Chaney – Appeals Judge

Edward Vilano – Appeals Judge