Title: 

APD 033318

Significant Decision

Date: 

February 12, 2004

Issues: 

Disabilty/Existence-Duration, Existence of Compensable Inj

Table of Contents

APD 033318

This appeal arises pursuant to the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act, TEX. LAB. CODE ANN. § 401.001 et seq. (1989 Act). A contested case hearing was held on November 21, 2003. With respect to the issues before her, the hearing officer determined that the respondent (claimant) sustained a compensable injury on ______________, and that he had disability, as a result of his compensable injury, from April 25, 2003, through the date of the hearing. In its appeal, the appellant (carrier) argues that the hearing officer’s injury and disability determinations are against the great weight of the evidence. In his response to the carrier’s appeal, the claimant urges affirmance.

DECISION

Affirmed.

The hearing officer did not err in making her injury and disability determinations. Those issues presented questions of fact for the hearing officer to resolve. The hearing officer is the sole judge of the weight and credibility of the evidence. Section 410.165(a). As the trier of fact, the hearing officer resolves the conflicts and inconsistencies in the evidence and decides what facts the evidence has established. Texas Employers Ins. Ass’n v. Campos, 666 S.W.2d 286 (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1984, no writ). The hearing officer was persuaded by the evidence that the claimant sustained his burden of proving that he sustained a compensable injury on ______________, when he slipped on some conduit while he was walking at work and that he had disability from April 25, 2003, through the date of the hearing. The factors emphasized by the carrier in challenging those determinations on appeal are the same factors it emphasized at the hearing. The significance, if any, of those factors was a matter for the hearing officer in resolving the issues before her. Nothing in our review of the record reveals that the challenged determinations are so against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence as to be clearly wrong or manifestly unjust. Accordingly, no sound basis exists for us to reverse those determinations on appeal. Cain v. Bain, 709 S.W.2d 175 (Tex. 1986).

The hearing officer’s decision and order are affirmed.

The true corporate name of the insurance carrier is BRITISH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY and the name and address of its registered agent for service of process is

CHARLES HARDY

3535 TRAVIS, SUITE 300

DALLAS, TEXAS 75204.

Elaine M. Chaney

CONCUR:

Chris Cowan – Appeals Judge

Margaret L. Turner – Appeals Judge