This appeal arises pursuant to the Texas Workers' Compensation Act, TEX. LAB. CODE ANN. § 401.001 et seq. (1989 Act). A contested case hearing was held on June 7, 2004. The hearing officer determined that: (1) the respondent (claimant) sustained a compensable injury on ____________; and (2) the claimant did not have disability. The appellant (carrier) appeals the injury determination on sufficiency of the evidence grounds. The claimant urges affirmance. The hearing officer’s disability determination was not appealed and has become final. Section 410.169.

DECISION

Affirmed.

The hearing officer did not err in determining that the claimant sustained a compensable injury on ____________. This determination involved a question of fact for the hearing officer to resolve. The hearing officer is the sole judge of the weight and credibility of the evidence (Section 410.165(a)) and, as the trier of fact, resolves the conflicts and inconsistencies in the evidence, including the medical evidence (Texas Employers Insurance Association v. Campos, 666 S.W.2d 286 (Tex. App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1984, no writ)). In view of the evidence presented, we cannot conclude that the hearing officer's determination is so against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence as to be clearly wrong or manifestly unjust. Cain v. Bain, 709 S.W.2d 175, 176 (Tex. 1986).

The decision and order of the hearing officer is affirmed.

The true corporate name of the insurance carrier is INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and the name and address of its registered agent for service of process is

CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY

800 BRAZOS STREET, SUITE 750, COMMODORE 1

AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701-2554.

Edward Vilano

CONCUR:

Thomas A. Knapp
Appeals Judge

Robert W. Potts
Appeals Judge