This appeal arises pursuant to the Texas Workers' Compensation Act, TEX. LAB. CODE ANN. § 401.001 et seq. (1989 Act). A contested case hearing was held on August 18, 2004. On the sole issue, the hearing officer determined that the appellant (claimant) has a two percent impairment rating (IR), as certified by the designated doctor appointed by the Texas Workers’ Compensation Commission (Commission). The claimant appeals this determination on sufficiency of the evidence grounds. The respondent (carrier) urges affirmance.
The hearing officer did not err in determining that the claimant has a two percent IR. The claimant asserts that the designated doctor’s certification is contrary to the great weight of the other medical evidence and requests adoption of her treating doctor’s report, which she believes fully evaluates her condition. Whether the great weight of the other medical evidence was contrary to the opinion of the designated doctor is basically a factual determination. Texas Workers' Compensation Commission Appeal No. 93459, decided July 15, 1993. Nothing in our review of the record indicates that the designated doctor failed to rate the claimant’s entire condition. Additionally, we view the report of the claimant=s treating doctor as representing a difference in medical opinion, which does not rise to the level of the great weight of medical evidence contrary to the designated doctor's report. Accordingly, we cannot conclude that the hearing officer's determination is so against the great weight and preponderance of the evidence as to be clearly wrong or manifestly unjust. Cain v. Bain, 709 S.W.2d 175, 176 (Tex. 1986).
The decision and order of the hearing officer is affirmed.
The true corporate name of the insurance carrier is ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY and the name and address of its registered agent for service of process is
LEO MALO ZURICH NORTH AMERICA
12222 MERIT DRIVE, SUITE 700
DALLAS, TEXAS 75251.
Daniel R. Barry
Thomas A. Knapp