Appeals Panel Decisions - Texas Worker

Appeals' Panel Decisions

APD 210237

The Appeals Panel reversed the Administrative Law Judge's decision for reconstruction of the record. The Appeals Panel noted that the number of pages indicated on the exhibit list did not match the number of pages in the exhibits.

APD 210207

The Appeals Panel reversed the Administrative Law Judge's decision for reconstruction of the record. The Appeals Panel noted that the number of pages indicated on the exhibit list did not match the number of pages in the exhibits.

APD 210196

The Appeals Panel reversed the decision so that the Administrative Law Judge could consider whether the claimant had good cause for failing to attend the contested case hearing.

APD 210093

The Appeals Panel reversed the Administrative Law Judge's decision for reconstruction of the record. The Appeals Panel noted that the number of pages indicated on the exhibit list did not match the number of pages in the exhibits.

APD 210249

The Appeals Panel reversed the Administrative Law Judge's decision for reconstruction of the record. The Appeals Panel noted that the number of pages indicated on the exhibit list did not match the number of pages in the exhibits.

APD 210186

The Appeals Panel reversed the decision because the Administrative Law Judge ruled on a "right knee meniscal tear" instead of a "right knee lateral meniscal tear." The Appeals Panel noted the parties had agreed during the hearing to add "lateral" to the condition.

APD 210136

The Appeals Panel reversed the Administrative Law Judge's decision for reconstruction of the record. The Appeals Panel noted that, for several of the exhibits, the number of pages indicated on the exhibit list did not match the number of pages in the exhibit.

APD 210137

The Appeals Panel reversed the decision of the Administrative Law Judge which was issued after the claimant failed to attend the hearing. The Appeals Panel noted that a good cause order issued by the Administrative Law Judge was defective because, although the style on the order reflected the correct docket number, it did not contain the claimant’s correct name.

APD 210080

The Appeals Panel reversed the decision of the Administrative Law Judge because the address provided on the carrier’s information form for the person identified as the registered agent was a post office box, where service of process could not be effectuated.

APD 210067

The Appeals Panel reversed the Administrative Law Judge's decision because the designated doctor failed to give an opinion regarding the entire extent-of-injury. The Appeals Panel found error in the designated doctor's report which stated that additional testing was necessary. However, the designated doctor failed to have the testing done before issuing the report.

1 2 3 … 2,038 Next »

Top