Your FREE and easy resource for all things Texas workers' compensation
At a Glance:
Title:
Martin v. Commercial Standard Fire & Marine Ins. Co.
Date:
February 20, 1974
Citation:
505 S.W.2d 799
Court:
Texas Supreme Court
Status:
Published Opinion

Martin v. Commercial Standard Fire & Marine Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Horace MARTIN, Petitioner,

v.

The COMMERCIAL STANDARD FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

No. B—4351.

|

Feb. 20, 1974.

Attorneys & Firms

*799 Harkness, Friedman & Kusin, Sherman A. Kusin, Texarkana, for petitioner.

Atchley, Russell, Hutchinson & Waldrop, Victor Hlavinka and Wayne Prescott, Texarkana, for respondent.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court rendered judgment for plaintiff Horace Martin, against Commercial Standard Fire and Marine Insurance Company. The court of civil appeals correctly ruled that the trial court did not acquire jurisdiction over the case because Commercial Standard Fire and Marine Insurance Company was not a party to the proceedings before the Texas Industrial *800 Accident Board. 501 S.W.2d 430. The concluding sentence of the opinion by the court of civil appeals is, ‘The judgment of the trial court is reversed and rendered.’ The sentence is subject to the construction that the court of civil appeals rendered judgment that the plaintiff take nothing. The judgment actually rendered by that court was one which set aside the ‘proceedings in the trial court.’

Upon reversal of a judgment, the court of civil appeals should render the judgment which the court below should have rendered. Rule 483, T.R.C.P.

End of Document
Top