Your FREE and easy resource for all things Texas workers' compensation
At a Glance:
Title:
Castleberry v. Goolsby Bldg. Corp.
Date:
July 15, 1981
Citation:
617 S.W.2d 665
Court:
Texas Supreme Court
Status:
Published Opinion

Castleberry v. Goolsby Bldg. Corp.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Clarence E. CASTLEBERRY, Petitioner,

v.

GOOLSBY BUILDING CORPORATION, Respondent.

No. B-9999.

|

April 29, 1981.

|

Rehearing Denied July 15, 1981.

Attorneys & Firms

*665 Connor & McCollough, J. Parker McCollough, Georgetown, Judge & Brown, Phil Brown, Amarillo, for petitioner.

Dyer & Redford, David J. Dunn and Cecil D. Redford, Corpus Christi, for respondent.

Opinion

CAMPBELL, Justice.

This is a suit for actual and exemplary damages under 608 S.W.2d 763. We affirm the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals.

Richard Ernest Castleberry was employed by Goolsby Building Corporation. On June 5, 1978, he was killed in an industrial accident while in the course of his employment. Clarence E. Castleberry, Individually as surviving *666 natural parent and as Administrator of the Estate of Richard Ernest Castleberry, Deceased, (Administrator) sued the City of Corpus Christi and Goolsby Building Corporation.2

The Administrator alleged Richard’s death was caused by certain “acts and/or omissions to act, which ... constitute gross, wanton, and willful negligence,” “grossly negligent acts,” “negligent, or grossly negligent, acts and omissions” and “ordinary or gross negligence.” Goolsby Building Corporation alleged in its motion for summary judgment that the Administrator failed to state a cause of action. The trial court rendered summary judgment that the Administrator take nothing against Goolsby Building Corporation.

The Administrator argues the Workers’ Compensation Act does not bar a deceased’s cause of action for intentional injuries which survive to the estate under Article 5525, the Texas Survival Statute. We agree.

Mitchell v. Akers, 401 S.W.2d 907 (Tex.Civ.App. Dallas 1966, writ ref’d n. r. e.).

The Workers’ Compensation Act exempts employers from common law liability based on negligence or gross negligence, except in death cases for exemplary damages as provided for in Article 5525.

The Administrator further argues the pleadings are sufficient to allege an “intentional injury” to Richard Castleberry by Goolsby Building Corporation.

Under McCamey v. Kinnear, 484 S.W.2d 150 (Tex.Civ.App. Beaumont 1972, writ ref’d n. r. e.). The Administrator’s allegations are insufficient to give the opposing attorney fair notice that this cause of action was for an “intentional injury.”

The Administrator contends an allegation of willful negligence or willful gross negligence is sufficient to allege an “intentional injury.” An allegation of willful negligence or willful gross negligence is an allegation based upon negligence and is insufficient to allege an “intentional injury.” An injury caused by willful negligence or willful gross negligence is not an intentional injury necessary to avoid the effect of the Workers’ Compensation Act.

The judgments of the courts below are affirmed.

Footnotes

1

All statutory references are to Texas Revised Civil Statutes Annotated.

2

The cause of action against Goolsby Building Corporation was severed from the cause of action against the City of Corpus Christi and a final judgment was rendered in favor of Goolsby Building Corporation. The City of Corpus Christi is not a party to this appeal.

End of Document
Top