Your FREE and easy resource for all things Texas workers' compensation
At a Glance:
Title:
Ritchey v. Vasquez
Date:
February 5, 1999
Citation:
986 S.W.2d 611
Court:
Texas Supreme Court
Status:
Published Opinion

Ritchey v. Vasquez

Supreme Court of Texas.

Angel RITCHEY and Haggar Apparel Company, Petitioners,

v.

Dominga VASQUEZ, Respondent.

No. 98–0788.

|

Feb. 4, 1999.

Attorneys & Firms

*612 Gregory F. Cox, Dallas, for Petitioners.

Aaron Pena, Jr., Miguel Salinas, Edinburg, for Respondent.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Respondent sued petitioners, the district court granted summary judgment for petitioners, the court of appeals reversed and remanded, Speer v. Presbyterian Children’s Home and Serv. Agency, 847 S.W.2d 227, 229 (Tex.1993). It follows that in dismissing the cause as moot we cannot make the dismissal with prejudice.

Petitioners move us to vacate the court of appeals’ opinion, but we decline to do so, consistent with our usual procedure. Houston Cable TV, Inc. v. Inwood West Civic Ass’n, 860 S.W.2d 72, 73 (Tex.1993).

Accordingly, petitioners’ motion is denied, respondent’s motion is granted in part, the petition for review is granted, the judgments of the court of appeals and of the district court are vacated without reference to the merits, and the cause is dismissed as moot.

End of Document
Top