APD 230204

The Appeals Panel reversed the decision of the Administrative Law Judge because the adopted certification did not rate the compensable injury in the case.

APD 230145

The Appeals Panel reversed the Administrative Law Judge’s decision regarding whether short-term disability payments were considered post-injury earnings. The Appeals Panel found that, because the short-term disability benefits were funded by the employer, they were post-injury earnings.

APD 230230

The Appeals Panel reversed the Administrative Law Judge’s decision regarding timely reporting. The Appeals Panel noted that where the 30th day after the date of injury was a Sunday, notice of injury was timely when given on the next working day, a Monday.

APD 230105

The Appeals Panel reversed the decision of the Administrative Law Judge because the adopted certification did not rate the compensable injury in the case.

APD 230137

The Appeals Panel reversed the decision of the Administrative Law Judge because the certifying doctor failed to state the value of Diffusing Capacity of Carbon Monoxide in assessing the claimant’s impairment.

APD 230102

The Appeals Panel reversed the decision of the Administrative Law Judge because the certifying doctor failed to state the value of Diffusing Capacity of Carbon Monoxide in assessing the claimant’s hearing loss.

APD 230114

The Appeals Panel reversed the decision of the Administrative Law Judge regarding disability because the determination exceeded the scope of the disability issue to decide.

APD 230150

The Appeals Panel reversed the decision of the Administrative Law Judge because the adopted certification did not rate the compensable injury in the case.

APD 230080

The Appeals Panel reversed the decision regarding entitlement to supplemental income benefits because the administrative law judge’s discussion of the evidence was inconsistent with the determination of entitlement.

APD 230096

The Appeals Panel reversed the decision of the Administrative Law Judge because the adopted certification did not rate the compensable injury in the case.