453-05-5142-m4

DECISION AND ORDER TPCIGA for Reliance National Insurance Company(Carrier) requested a hearing on a decision by the Medical Review Division (MRD) of the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation (Division)[1] because the MRD failed to order a refund. Vista Medical Center Hospital (Provider) requested a hearing on a decision by the MRD denying […]

453-05-5865-m4

DECISION AND ORDER Vista Medical Center Hospital (Provider) requested a hearing on a decision by the Medical Review Division (MRD) of the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation (Division)[1] denying additional reimbursement to Provider for a hospital stay provided to Claimant, an injured worker. Provider argued that reimbursement for this admission should be […]

453-05-6366-m4

DECISION AND ORDER Vista Medical Center Hospital (Provider) requested a hearing on a decision by the Medical Review Division (MRD) of the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation (Division)[1] denying additional reimbursement to Provider for a hospital stay provided to Claimant, an injured worker. Provider argued that reimbursement for this admission should be […]

453-05-3227-m4

DECISION AND ORDER American Home Assurance Company(Carrier) requested a hearing on a decision by the Medical Review Division (MRD) of the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation (Division),[1] ordering additional reimbursement to Presbyterian Hospital (Provider) for a hospital stay provided to Claimant, an injured worker. Provider argued that reimbursement for this admission should […]

454-06-0898-p1

DECISION AND ORDER National Fire Insurance Company (Carrier) challenges a medical interlocutory order (MIO) issued by the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation (Division), requiring it to pay for certain office visits and medications provided over a ninety-day period. The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) concludes that Carrier did not persuasively show that the […]

453-05-2847-m4

DECISION AND ORDER Texas Mutual Insurance Company (Carrier) requested a hearing on a decision by the Medical Review Division (MRD) of the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation (Division)[1] ordering additional reimbursement to Vista Medical Center Hospital (Provider) for a hospital stay provided to Claimant, an injured worker. Provider argued that reimbursement for […]

453-05-2848-m4

DECISION AND ORDER Texas Mutual Insurance Company (Carrier) requested a hearing on a decision by the Medical Review Division (MRD) of the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation (Division)[1] ordering additional reimbursement to Vista Medical Center Hospital (Provider) for a hospital stay provided to Claimant, an injured worker. Provider argued that reimbursement for […]

453-03-0543-m4

DECISION AND ORDER I. INTRODUCTION Vista Healthcare, Inc. (Vista) requested a hearing to contest decisions by the Medical Review Division (MRD) of the Texas Workers’ Compensation Commission (Commission) denying additional payment for ambulatory surgical center services.[1] Vista operated ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) in Houston, Texas, and provided surgical services to patients not requiring in-patient hospitalization. […]

454-06-0702-p1

DECISION AND ORDER ________ (Carrier) challenges a medical interlocutory order (MIO) issued by the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation (Division) requiring Carrier to pay A. L. Shaw, M.D. (Provider) for providing medical services to an injured worker (Claimant). Carl Simpson, M.D., performed a prospective review medical examination (PRME) of Claimant and determined […]

453-05-5866-m4

DECISION AND ORDER Vista Medical Center Hospital (Provider) requested a hearing on a decision by the Medical Review Division (MRD) of the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation (Division)[1] denying additional reimbursement to Provider for a hospital stay provided to Claimant, an injured worker. Provider argued that reimbursement for this admission should be […]