453-02-3513-m4-etal
DECISION AND ORDER I. INTRODUCTION Vista Healthcare, Inc. (Vista) requested a hearing to contest ten decisions by the Medical Review Division (MRD) of the Texas Workers’ Compensation Commission (Commission) denying additional payment for ambulatory surgical center services.[1] Vista operated ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) in Houston, Texas, and provided surgical services to patients who did not […]
453-02-3975-m4
DECISION AND ORDER I. INTRODUCTION Vista Healthcare, Inc. (Vista) requested a hearing to contest decisions by the Medical Review Division (MRD) of the Texas Workers’ Compensation Commission (Commission) denying additional payment for ambulatory surgical center services.[1] Vista operated ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) in Houston, Texas, and provided surgical services to patients not requiring in-patient hospitalization. […]
453-03-0577-m4-etal
DECISION AND ORDER I. INTRODUCTION Vista Healthcare, Inc. (Vista) requested a hearing to contest decisions by the Medical Review Division (MRD) of the Texas Workers’ Compensation Commission (Commission) denying additional payment for ambulatory surgical center (ASC) services.[1] Vista operated ASCs in Texas, and provided surgical services to patients not requiring in-patient hospitalization. As related to […]
453-03-3973-m4-etal
DECISION AND ORDER I. INTRODUCTION Vista Healthcare, Inc. (Vista) requested a hearing to contest two decisions by the Medical Review Division (MRD) of the Texas Workers’ Compensation Commission (Commission) denying additional payment for ambulatory surgical center services.[1] Vista operated ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) in Houston, Texas, and provided surgical services to patients who did not […]
453-03-0563-m4-etal
DECISION AND ORDER I. INTRODUCTION Vista Healthcare, Inc. (Vista) requested a hearing to contest decisions by the Medical Review Division (MRD) of the Texas Workers’ Compensation Commission (Commission)[1] denying additional payment for ambulatory surgical center (ASC) services. Vista operated ASCs in Texas, providing surgical services to patients not requiring in-patient hospitalization. In this consolidated docket, […]
453-03-0152-m4-etal
DECISION AND ORDER I. INTRODUCTION Vista Healthcare, Inc. (Vista) requested a hearing to contest a decision by the Medical Review Division (MRD) of the Texas Workers’ Compensation Commission (Commission) denying additional payment for ambulatory surgical center services.[1] Vista operated ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) in Houston, Texas, and provided surgical services to patients not requiring in-patient […]
453-05-5829-m4
DECISION AND ORDER Corpus Christi Medical Center (Provider) requested a hearing on a decision by the Medical Review Division (MRD) of the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation (Division)[1] denying additional reimbursement to Provider for a hospital stay provided to Claimant, an injured worker. Provider argued that reimbursement for this admission should be […]
453-05-6625-m4
DECISION AND ORDER Corpus Christi Medical Center (Provider) requested a hearing on a decision by the Medical Review Division (MRD) of the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation (Division)[1] denying additional reimbursement to Provider for a hospital stay provided to Claimant, an injured worker. Provider argued that reimbursement for this admission should be […]
453-05-7052-m4
DECISION AND ORDER Spring Branch Medical Center (Provider) requested a hearing on a decision by the Medical Review Division (MRD) of the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation (Division)[1] denying additional reimbursement to Provider for a hospital stay provided to Claimant, an injured worker. Provider argued that reimbursement for this admission should be […]
453-05-7056-m4
DECISION AND ORDER Texas Orthopedic Hospital (Provider) requested a hearing on a decision by the Medical Review Division (MRD) of the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation (Division)[1] denying additional reimbursement to Provider for a hospital stay provided to Claimant, an injured worker. Provider argued that reimbursement for this admission should be based […]