APD 210738
The Appeals Panel reversed the decision because the Administrative Law Judge did not make a specific finding of fact regarding the issue of disability as was certified in the case.
APD 210736
The Appeals Panel reversed the Administrative Law Judge’s decision for reconstruction of the record. The Appeals Panel noted that the number of pages indicated on the exhibit list did not match the number of pages in the exhibits. The Appeals Panel also noted that when there is an intervening injury, the correct standard of law is whether the intervening injury is the sole cause of the disputed condition or disability.
APD 210723
The Appeals Panel reversed the administrative law judge’s decision for reconstruction of the record. The Appeals Panel noted that the number of pages indicated on the exhibit list did not match the number of pages in the exhibits.
APD 210651
The Appeals Panel reversed the decision because the Administrative Law Judge based her extent-of-injury determination, in part, on a misreading of the designated doctor’s extent-of-injury opinion.
APD 210616
The Appeals Panel reversed the Administrative Law Judge’s decision for reconstruction of the record. The Appeals Panel noted that the number of pages indicated on the exhibit list did not match the number of pages in the exhibits. Additionally, the Appeals Panel found that the self-insured’s submitted information indicated the wrong name and failed to state the name of the registered agent.
APD 210601
The Appeals Panel reversed the administrative law judge’s decision for reconstruction of the record. The Appeals Panel noted that the number of pages indicated on the exhibit list did not match the number of pages in the exhibits.
APD 210524
The Appeals Panel reversed the Administrative Law Judge’s decision for reconstruction of the record. The Appeals Panel noted that the number of pages indicated on the exhibit list did not match the number of pages in the exhibits. The Appeals Panel also noted that clarification was needed from the designated doctor regarding the calculation of IR.
APD 210422
The Appeals Panel reversed the decision because the Administrative Law Judge’s discussion of the evidence was inconsistent with the determination of extent of injury.
APD 210431
The Appeals Panel reversed the Administrative Law Judge’s decision for reconstruction of the record. The Appeals Panel noted that the number of pages indicated on the exhibit list did not match the number of pages in the exhibits.
APD 210449
The Appeals Panel reversed the decision because the Administrative Law Judge misstated the claimant’s testimony in this case regarding the manner in which the compensable injury was alleged to have occurred.