APD 210524

The Appeals Panel reversed the Administrative Law Judge’s decision for reconstruction of the record. The Appeals Panel noted that the number of pages indicated on the exhibit list did not match the number of pages in the exhibits. The Appeals Panel also noted that clarification was needed from the designated doctor regarding the calculation of IR.

APD 210422

The Appeals Panel reversed the decision because the Administrative Law Judge’s discussion of the evidence was inconsistent with the determination of extent of injury.

APD 210449

The Appeals Panel reversed the decision because the Administrative Law Judge misstated the claimant’s testimony in this case regarding the manner in which the compensable injury was alleged to have occurred.

APD 210479

The Appeals Panel reversed the Administrative Law Judge’s decision for reconstruction of the record. The Appeals Panel noted that the number of pages indicated on the exhibit list did not match the number of pages in the exhibits.

APD 210421

The Appeals Panel reversed the Administrative Law Judge’s decision for reconstruction of the record. The Appeals Panel noted that the number of pages indicated on the exhibit list did not match the number of pages in the exhibits.

APD 210429

The Appeals Panel reversed the decision because the Administrative Law Judge adopted a certification that did not consider the entire compensable injury.

APD 210450

The Appeals Panel reversed the decision because the Administrative Law Judge failed to make a finding on one of the disputed conditions listed in the extent of injury issue.

APD 210317

The Appeals Panel reversed the decision because the Administrative Law Judge incorrectly required expert medical evidence regarding sprains and strains.

APD 210326

The Appeals Panel reversed the Administrative Law Judge’s decision because the self-insured’s information form failed to state the name of the registered agent for service of process (it simply stated the self-insured’s name).

APD 210402

The Appeals Panel reversed the decision because the Administrative Law Judge misread the causation evidence regarding disc bulges.