APD 210449

The Appeals Panel reversed the decision because the Administrative Law Judge misstated the claimant’s testimony in this case regarding the manner in which the compensable injury was alleged to have occurred.

APD 210479

The Appeals Panel reversed the Administrative Law Judge’s decision for reconstruction of the record. The Appeals Panel noted that the number of pages indicated on the exhibit list did not match the number of pages in the exhibits.

APD 210421

The Appeals Panel reversed the Administrative Law Judge’s decision for reconstruction of the record. The Appeals Panel noted that the number of pages indicated on the exhibit list did not match the number of pages in the exhibits.

APD 210429

The Appeals Panel reversed the decision because the Administrative Law Judge adopted a certification that did not consider the entire compensable injury.

APD 210450

The Appeals Panel reversed the decision because the Administrative Law Judge failed to make a finding on one of the disputed conditions listed in the extent of injury issue.

APD 210317

The Appeals Panel reversed the decision because the Administrative Law Judge incorrectly required expert medical evidence regarding sprains and strains.

APD 210402

The Appeals Panel reversed the decision because the Administrative Law Judge misread the causation evidence regarding disc bulges.

APD 210332

The Appeals Panel reversed the decision because the Administrative Law Judge failed to make all necessary findings of fact.

APD 210238

The Appeals Panel reversed the Administrative Law Judge’s decision for reconstruction of the record. The Appeals Panel noted that the number of pages indicated on the exhibit list did not match the number of pages in the exhibits.

APD 210361

The Appeals Panel reversed the decision because the Administrative Law Judge adopted a certification where the designated doctor applied Table 42 incorrectly for the reported ROM for flexion contracture and failed to provide ROM measurements in the narrative to support the impairment assessed using Table 45.