Libraries

Administrative Decisions

Appeals' Panel Decisions

Medical Decisions

Court Cases

Texas State Cases

Texas Federal Cases

Statutes & Rules

Texas Workers' Compensation Act

Texas Workers' Compensation Rules

Resources

Appeals' Panel Manual

Tools

ICD Code Lookup

National Provider Lookup

Texas Worker Supports

Latest Decisions & Cases

In re Morales

The First Court of Appeals (Houston) denied Employee-Plaintiff's writ of mandamus because Employee-Plaintiff presented no complaint about a trial court ruling or an action that required the Court to enforce its jurisdiction.

APD 210738

The Appeals Panel reversed the decision because the Administrative Law Judge did not make a specific finding of fact regarding the issue of disability as was certified in the case.

APD 210679

The Appeals Panel reversed the Administrative Law Judge's decision because the self-insured failed to provide the name and address of a registered agent in Texas.

APD 210561

The Appeals Panel reversed the Administrative Law Judge's decision because the address on the insurance carrier's registered-agent-information form was a post office box, where service of process could be effectuated.

Voelter v. Daimler Trucks of North Amer-ica

The United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (San Antonio) granted summary judgment because the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act’s exclusive-remedy provision barred Plaintiff-Employee's tort claims asserted against Defendant-Employer.

APD 210736

The Appeals Panel reversed the Administrative Law Judge's decision for reconstruction of the record. The Appeals Panel noted that the number of pages indicated on the exhibit list did not match the number of pages in the exhibits. The Appeals Panel also noted that when there is an intervening injury, the correct standard of law is whether the intervening injury is the sole cause of the disputed condition or disability.

1 2 3 … 4,901 Next »

Top