142.12
(a) Definitions. The following words and terms, as used in this chapter, shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise: (1) Evidence–Testimony or documents, including books, papers, and tangible things. (2) Service–Delivery of a subpoena by an authorized individual to the person to whom it is addressed. (3) Subpoena–A division order issued […]
142.14
(a) A party may request permission to have the hearing recorded by a court reporter provided by the party. The party may select, and must bear the cost of, the court reporter. (b) A request for permission to use a court reporter may be made in any manner and at any time before the hearing. […]
142.16
(a) After the record closes, the administrative law judge shall issue a decision on benefits. The decision shall: (1) be in writing; (2) include findings of fact and conclusions of law; a determination of whether benefits are due; and, if so, an award of benefits due; and (3) be signed by the administrative law judge. […]
142.18
(a) Priority setting for case on remand from appeals panel. When the appeals panel reverses an administrative law judge’s decision and remands the case for further consideration, the division shall set the hearing to be held within 30 days of the date of the appeals panel’s decision. (b) Notice of hearing. After setting a hearing […]
142.20
(a) The administrative law judge may enter an interlocutory order to pay all or part of income benefits or medical benefits. (b) An interlocutory order contained in a decision supercedes the decision as it pertains to the payment of income benefits or medical benefits and remains in effect until: (1) the decision becomes final in […]
143.1
The following words and terms, when used in this chapter, shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. (1) Appellant–A party to a benefit contested case hearing who is dissatisfied with the decision of the administrative law judge, and files a request for review of that decision by the appeals panel. (2) […]
143.2
(a) To review the decision of the administrative law judge, the appeals panel considers the appellant’s request, the respondent’s response, and the record of the benefit contested case hearing. The parties do not appear in person before the panel. (b) The appeals panel may: (1) reverse the decision of the administrative law judge and render […]
143.3
(a) A party to a benefit contested case hearing who is dissatisfied with the decision of the administrative law judge may request the appeals panel to review that decision. The request shall: (1) be in writing; (2) clearly and concisely rebut each issue in the administrative law judge’s decision that the appellant wants reviewed, and […]
143.4
(a) The other party shall respond to the appellant’s request. The response shall: (1) be in writing; (2) clearly and concisely support each issue in the administrative law judge’s decision that the appellant has rebutted in the request, and state why the appellant’s relief should not be granted; (3) be filed with the Chief Clerk […]
143.5
(a) Not later than the 45th day after the date the response was filed with the division, the appeals panel will issue its written decision, concluding with a separate paragraph stating words to the effect: “The true corporate name of the insurance carrier is (NAME IN BOLD PRINT) and the name and address of its […]