453-05-5866-m4
DECISION AND ORDER Vista Medical Center Hospital (Provider) requested a hearing on a decision by the Medical Review Division (MRD) of the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation (Division)[1] denying additional reimbursement to Provider for a hospital stay provided to Claimant, an injured worker. Provider argued that reimbursement for this admission should be […]
453-05-2084-m4
DECISION AND ORDER Texas Mutual Insurance Company (Carrier) requested a hearing on a decision by the Medical Review Division (MRD) of the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation (Division)[1] ordering additional reimbursement to Vista Medical Center Hospital (Provider) for a hospital stay provided to Claimant, an injured worker. Provider argued that reimbursement for […]
453-05-2120-m4
DECISION AND ORDER Texas Mutual Insurance Company (Carrier) requested a hearing on a decision by the Medical Review Division (MRD) of the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation (Division)[1] ordering additional reimbursement to Vista Medical Center Hospital (Provider) for a hospital stay provided to Claimant, an injured worker. Provider argued that reimbursement for […]
453-05-1649-m4
DECISION AND ORDER American Home Assurance Company (Carrier) requested a hearing on a decision by the Medical Review Division (MRD) of the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation (Division)[1] ordering additional reimbursement to Vista Medical Center Hospital (Provider) for a hospital stay provided to Claimant, an injured worker. Provider argued that reimbursement for […]
453-05-2027-m4
DECISION AND ORDER American Home Assurance Company (Carrier) requested a hearing on a decision by the Medical Review Division (MRD) of the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation (Division)[1] ordering additional reimbursement to Southwest Texas Methodist Hospital (Provider) for a hospital stay provided to Claimant, an injured worker. Provider argued that reimbursement for […]
453-05-2140-m4
DECISION AND ORDER Continental Casualty Company (Carrier) requested a hearing on a decision by the Medical Review Division (MRD) of the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation (Division)[1] ordering additional reimbursement to Vista Medical Center Hospital (Provider) for a hospital stay provided to Claimant, an injured worker. Provider argued that reimbursement for this […]
453-05-2888-m4
DECISION AND ORDER Zurich American Insurance Company (Carrier) requested a hearing on a decision by the Medical Review Division (MRD) of the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation (Division)[1] ordering additional reimbursement to Vista Medical Center Hospital (Provider) for a hospital stay provided to Claimant, an injured worker. Provider argued that reimbursement for […]
453-05-3045-m4
DECISION AND ORDER Zenith American Insurance Company (Carrier) requested a hearing on a decision by the Medical Review Division (MRD) of the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation (Division)[1] ordering additional reimbursement to Metropolitan Methodist Hospital (Provider) for a hospital stay provided to Claimant, an injured worker. Provider argued that reimbursement for this […]
453-05-4964-m4
DECISION AND ORDER HCA Spring Branch Medical Center (Provider) requested a hearing on a decision by the Medical Review Division (MRD) of the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation (Division)[1] denying additional reimbursement to Provider for a hospital stay provided to Claimant, an injured worker. Provider argued that reimbursement for this admission should […]
453-05-1678-m4
DECISION AND ORDER Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (Carrier) requested a hearing on a decision by the Medical Review Division (MRD) of the Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers’ Compensation (Division)[1] ordering additional reimbursement to Vista Medical Center Hospital (Provider) for a hospital stay provided to Claimant, an injured worker. Provider argued that reimbursement for […]