Title: 

APD 020740

Significant Decision

Date: 

May 8, 2002

Issues: 

Extent of Injury

Table of Contents

APD 020740

This appeal arises pursuant to the Texas Workers’ Compensation Act, TEX. LAB. CODE ANN. § 401.001 et seq. (1989 Act). A contested case hearing was held on March 11, 2002. The hearing officer resolved the sole disputed issue by determining that the compensable injury sustained on ______________, does not extend to and include an injury to the right elbow and right shoulder or to depression and anxiety. In her appeal, the claimant essentially argues that the hearing officer’s determination in that regard is against the great weight of the evidence. In its response, the respondent (carrier) urges affirmance.

DECISION

Affirmed.

The hearing officer did not err in determining that the compensable injury of ______________, does not extend to and include an injury to the right elbow and right shoulder or to depression and anxiety. Extent of injury is a question of fact for the hearing officer to resolve. Texas Workers’ Compensation Commission Appeal No. 93613, decided August 24, 1993. Section 410.165(a) provides that the contested case hearing officer, as finder of fact, is the sole judge of the relevance and materiality of the evidence as well as of the weight and credibility that is to be given the evidence. It was for the hearing officer, as trier of fact, to resolve the inconsistencies and conflicts in the evidence and to decide what facts that evidence established. Garza v. Commercial Ins. Co., 508 S.W.2d 701, 702 (Tex. Civ. App.-Amarillo 1974, no writ). When reviewing a hearing officer’s decision for factual sufficiency, we should reverse such decision only if it is so contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence as to be clearly wrong or manifestly unjust and we do not so find in this case. Cain v. Bain, 709 S.W.2d 175, 176 (Tex. 1986).

The true corporate name of the insurance carrier is INSURANCE COMPANY OF STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and the name and address of its registered agent for service of process is

CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY

800 BRAZOS, SUITE 750

COMMODORE I

AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701.

Elaine M. Chaney

CONCUR:

Thomas A. Knapp – Appeals Judge

Roy L. Warren – Appeals Judge