APD 201870

The Appeals Panel reversed the decision because the Administrative Law Judge failed to make a determination on the entire disability period.

APD 201734

The Appeals Panel reversed the decision because the Administrative Law Judge failed to modify the disability issue as agreed to by the parties.

APD 201812

The Appeals Panel reversed the decision because the Administrative Law Judge adopted an impairment rating that did not consider and rate the entire compensable injury in the case.

APD 201713

The Appeals Panel reversed the decision of the administrative law judge for clerical errors.

APD 201642

The Appeals Panel reversed the administrative law judge’s decision that the claimant did not have disability while receiving salary continuation from the employer. The Appeals Panel rendered a new decision finding that the claimant had disability because the injured employee “was not performing personal services for the employer in exchange for the salary continuation.”

APD 201565

The Appeals Panel reversed the decision because the administrative law judge issued inconsistent conclusions of law. Specifically, the administrative law judge found the date of injury to be in 2019, but the administrative law judge determined compensability for a 2018 date of injury.

APD 201479

The Appeals Panel reversed the decision of the administrative law judge because evidence that was clearly part of the hearing was not made part of the record.

APD 201505

The Appeals Panel reversed the decision because, in calculating the average weekly wage, the administrative law judge failed to consider the value of an apartment and utilities that the claimant received from the employer during a portion of the 13-week period.

APD 201653

The Appeals Panel reversed the decision of the administrative law judge for reconstruction of the record.

APD 201379

The Appeals Panel reversed the decision because the Administrative Law Judge based his determination that the claimant reached maximum medical improvement on an incorrect belief that the parties had stipulated to the issue.