APD 210218
The Appeals Panel reversed the decision because the Administrative Law Judge made inconsistent and conflicting findings of fact and determinations regarding the issue of timely notice to the employer.
APD 210093
The Appeals Panel reversed the Administrative Law Judge’s decision for reconstruction of the record. The Appeals Panel noted that the number of pages indicated on the exhibit list did not match the number of pages in the exhibits.
APD 210186
The Appeals Panel reversed the decision because the Administrative Law Judge ruled on a “right knee meniscal tear” instead of a “right knee lateral meniscal tear.” The Appeals Panel noted the parties had agreed during the hearing to add “lateral” to the condition.
APD 210136
The Appeals Panel reversed the Administrative Law Judge’s decision for reconstruction of the record. The Appeals Panel noted that, for several of the exhibits, the number of pages indicated on the exhibit list did not match the number of pages in the exhibit.
APD 201870
The Appeals Panel reversed the decision because the Administrative Law Judge failed to make a determination on the entire disability period.
APD 201734
The Appeals Panel reversed the decision because the Administrative Law Judge failed to modify the disability issue as agreed to by the parties.
APD 201642
The Appeals Panel reversed the administrative law judge’s decision that the claimant did not have disability while receiving salary continuation from the employer. The Appeals Panel rendered a new decision finding that the claimant had disability because the injured employee “was not performing personal services for the employer in exchange for the salary continuation.”
APD 201479
The Appeals Panel reversed the decision of the administrative law judge because evidence that was clearly part of the hearing was not made part of the record.
APD 201505
The Appeals Panel reversed the decision because, in calculating the average weekly wage, the administrative law judge failed to consider the value of an apartment and utilities that the claimant received from the employer during a portion of the 13-week period.
APD 201653
The Appeals Panel reversed the decision of the administrative law judge for reconstruction of the record.